Impact of Irrigation and Fertigation Levels on the Growth and Yield of Elephant Foot Yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson)

Authors

  • K Venkatesan Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003
  • Saraswathi, T. Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu
  • Pugalendhi, L. Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu
  • Jhansi Rani, P Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu

Keywords:

Elephant foot yam, fertigation, drip irrigation, CPE, yield

Abstract

Elephant foot yam is gaining popularity as a commercial or cash crop in Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal,  Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Tripura. Its area is expanding in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and  Maharashtra. However, lack of scientific studies on fertigation hinders its further expansion in the  nontraditional and water scarce areas. Judicious and optimal use of water and fertilizers are prerequisites  to maximize the productivity and return. Hence, field experiments were carried out at  Department of Vegetable Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural  University, Coimbatore during 2010-2013 through AICRP on Tuber Crops to standardize drip with  fertigation technology for elephant foot yam. The experiment was laid out in factorial RBD and replicated  thrice. For standardizing the fertigation system, five irrigation levels (I1-25% cumulative pan evaporation  (CPE); I2-50% CPE; I3-75% CPE ; I4-100% CPE and I5-Flood irrigation) and four fertigation levels (F1 -fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF); F2-fertigation with 75% RDF; F3-fertigation  with 50% RDF and F4-absolute control) were followed.. The greatest plant height (78.89 cm),  pseudostem girth (12.29 cm), canopy spread EW (65.58 cm) and NS (64.47 cm) were observed  under application of 100% RDF along with flood irrigation. There was significant difference in yield  among fertilizer levels and irrigation levels. The highest corm yield (47.66 t ha-1) was observed under  application of 100% RDF along with irrigation at 100% CPE.

Author Biography

K Venkatesan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003

Dr. K. Venkatesan Professor (Horticulture)Post Harvest Technology CentreAEC & RI, TNAU

References

Chandra, S. 1984. Edible Aroids. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 252 p.

Chawla, J.K. and Narda, N.K.2000. Growth parameters of trickle fertigated potato. Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 70(11): 747-752.

Das, P.K., Sen, H., Banerjee, N.C. and Panda, P.K. 1995. Light interception, yield attributes and seed corm production of elephant foot yam as influenced by varying plant densities and sett sizes. J. Root Crops, 21(2): 92-96.

Doyle, A., Smittle, W., Dickens, L. and James, R. 1994. Irrigation regimes affect yield and water use by bell pepper. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 119(5): 936-939.

Ertek, A., Sensoy, S., Geddik, I. and Kuciikyumuk, C. 2007. Irrigation scheduling for green capsicum (Capsicum annum L.) grown by field condition by using class A pan evaporation value. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environmental Sci., 2(4): 349-358.

Hetterscheid, W. and Ittenbach, S. 1996. Everything you always wanted to know about Amorphophallus, but afraid to stick your nose into. Aroideana, 19: 7-13.

Manickasundaram, P., Selvaraj, P.K., Krishnamoorthi, V.V. and Gnanamurthy, P. 2002. Drip irrigation and fertigation in tapioca. Madras Agric. J., 89(7-9): 466-468.

Nalge, D.N., Khonde, N.M., Jadhao, S.M. and Kanase, N. 2008. Response of cotton under drip irrigation in vertisols. Green Fmg, 2(3):173-176.

Odubanjo, O., Olufayo, A.A. and Oguntunde, P.G. 2011. Water use, growth and yield of drip irrigated cassava in a humid tropical environment. Soil Water Res., 6(1): 10-20.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Patel, J.C., Patel, N.B., Saravaiya, S.K., Desai, K.D. and Tekale, G.S. 2011. Effect of spacing and corm size on growth and yield of elephant foot yam under south Gujarat conditions. J. Root Crops, 37(1): 88-89.

Patel, N. and Rajput, T.B.S. 2000. Effects of fertigation on growth and yield of onion. Proceedings International Conference. Micro and Sprinkler Irrigation Systems, 8-10 February 2000, Jalgaon, Maharashtra. 77.

Shibhila Mar y, S. and Balakrishnan, R. 1990. Studies on the effect of

irrigation, nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of chilli, Indian Hort., 47(4): 413-416.

Singh, S., Singh, S.B., Verma, R.B. and Singh, T. 1997. Growth, yield and quality of elephant foot yam as affected by various levels of nitrogen, potassium and spacing. Prog. Hort., 29(12): 41-47.

Thaman, R.R. 1984. Intensification of edible aroid cultivation in the Pacific Islands. In: Edible Aroids. (Chandra, S.) (Ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.102-122

Verma, R.B., Singh, P.K. and Singh, S.B. 1996. Effect of N and K levels on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of Colocasia. J. Root Crops, 22 22(2): 139-143.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-15

How to Cite

Venkatesan, K., T., S., L., P., & P, J. R. (2015). Impact of Irrigation and Fertigation Levels on the Growth and Yield of Elephant Foot Yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson). JOURNAL OF ROOT CROPS, 40(1), 52–55. Retrieved from https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/159

Issue

Section

Research Articles