Geospatial Assessment and Mapping of Selected Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Farm Level: A Case Study in an Ultisol

Authors

  • Sabitha Soman Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Sreekariyam Trivandrum - 695017, Kerala
  • Byju, G. Principal Scientist Division of Crop Production Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Sreekariyam Trivandrum - 695017, Kerala

Keywords:

Spatial variability, global positioning system (GPS), geographical information system (GIS), geostatistics, semivariograms, kriging

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of spatial variability of soil properties is important in site specific nutrient management, precision farming and sustainable land management. The study assessed the spatial variation of soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental farm of Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (CTCRI), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Georeferenced surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) soil samples were collected from 130 locations, 50-60 m apart, in an irregular grid. Spatial variability analysis was done for selected soil physical and chemical properties like bulk density, water holding capacity, porosity, soil texture, organic C, available N, available P and exchangeable K. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out to study the variability of different soil properties. The spatial analysis was done using geostatistical analyst extension of ArcGIS 10.0 software. Results showed that majority of the farm area are sandy clay in texture. Among the soil physical properties studied, bulk density and porosity showed low spatial variations (CV <10.00) in both soil layers. Among the soil chemical properties studied, very high spatial variability was observed for available P followed by exchangeable K. Gaussian and exponential models fitted well with the experimental semivariograms of most of the soil physico-chemical properties. The nugget to sill ratios, which gives the degree of spatial dependence, was observed to be weak to strong for the soil properties. Spatial distributions of soil physico-chemical properties in the farm were estimated using kriging interpolation. The semivariogram parameters were used for kriging that produced interpolation maps of the soil properties which can be used as very good tools for farm planning at regional scale.

References

Afshar, H., Salehi, M. H., Mohammadi, J. and Mehnatkesh, A. 2009. Spatial variability of soil properties and irrigated wheat yield in quantitative suitability map, a case study: Share Kian Area, Chaharmahaleva Bakhtiari province. J. Water Soil, 23(1): 161-172.

Al-Omran, A. M., Al-Wabel, M. I., El-Maghraby, S. E., Nadeem, M. E. and

Al-Sharani, S. 2013. Spatial variability for some properties of the waste water irrigated soils. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 12: 167-175.

Amirinejad, A. A., Kamble, K., Aggarwal, P., Chakraborty, D., Pradhan, S. and Mittal, R. B. 2011. Assessment and mapping of spatial variation of soil physical health in a farm. Geoderma, 160: 292-303.

Burgess, T. M. and Webster, R. 1980. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic

mapping of soil properties. 1. The semi-variogram and punctual kriging.

J. Soil Sci., 31: 315-331.

Cambardella, C. A. and Karlen, D. L. 1999. Spatial analysis of soil

fertility parameters. Precis. Agric., 1: 5-14.

Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L.,

Turco, R. F. and Konopka, A. E. 1994. Field scale variability of

soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,

: 1501-1511.

Cemek, B., Guler, M., Kilic, K., Demir, Y. and Arslan, H. 2007.

Assessment of spatial variability in some soil properties as related

to soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra plain in northern Turkey.

Environ. Monit. Assess., 124: 223-234.

Chang, K. 2012. Introduction to Geographic Information Systems.

Tata McGraw Hill Education Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In:

Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical

Properties, including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling.

Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., Ensminger, L. E., White, J. L., Clark,

F. E. and Dinauer, R. C. (Eds.). ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

pp. 552-562.

Goovaerts, P. 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial

variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil

properties. Biol. Fert. Soils, 27: 315-334.

Iqbal, J., Thomasson, J. A., Jenkins, J. N., Owen, P. R. and Whisler,

F. D. 2005. Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties

of alluvial soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69: 1338-1350.

Kavianpoor, H., Ouri, A. E., Jeloudar, Z. J. and Kavian, A. 2012.

Spatial variability of some chemical and physical soil properties

in Nesho Mountainous Rangelands. Am. J. Envt. Engng., 2(1):

-44.

Kilic, K., Ozgoz, E. and Akbas, F. 2004. Assessment of spatial

variability in penetration resistance as related to some soil

physical properties of two fluvents in Turkey. Soil Till. Res.,

: 1-11.

Krige, D. G. 1951. A statistical approach to some basic mine

valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J. Chem. Metal.

Mining Soc. South Africa, 52(6):119-139.

Mohawesh, O., Fukumura, K., Ishida, T. and Yoshino, K. 2005.

Assessment of spatial variability of soil and canopy properties

in a cassava field. J. Japan Soc. Hydro. Water Resour.,

: 501-509.

Muhr, C. R., Datta, N. P., Sankrasubramoney, H., Leley, V. K. and

Donahue, R. L. 1965. Soil Testing in India. USAID, New Delhi,

India.

Nourzadeh, M., Mahdian, M. H., Malakouti, M. J. and Khavazi, K.

Investigation and prediction spatial variability in chemical

properties of agricultural soil using geostatistics. Arch. Agron.

Soil Sci., 58(5): 461-475.

Okae-Anti, D. and Ogoe, J. I. 2006. Analysis of variability of some

properties of a semideciduous forest soil.Commun. Soil Sci.

Plant Anal., 37: 211-223.

Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. 1982. Methods of Soil

Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA,

SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Santra, P., Chopra, U. K. and Chakraborty, D. 2008. Spatial variability

of soil properties and its application in predicting surface map

of hydraulic parameters in an agricultural farm. Curr. Sci.,

(7): 937-945.

Sekhon, G. S., Chhonkar, P. K., Das, D. K., Goswami, N. N.,

Narayanasamy, G., Poonia, S. R., Rattan, R. K. and Sehgal, J. L.

Fundamentals of Soil Science. Indian Society of Soil

Science, New Delhi, India.

Soil Sur vey Organization. 2007. Benchmark Soils of Kerala.

Department of Agriculture, Government of Kerala, India.

Suja, G., Nayar, T. V. R. and Potty, V. P. 2005. Response of cassava

(Manihot esculenta Crantz) to biofertilizers. J. Root Crops,

(2): 100-105.

Trangmar, B. B., Yost, R. S. and Uehara, G. 1985. Application of

geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv. Agron.,

: 45-93.

Virgilio, N. D., Monti, A. and Venturi, G. 2007. Spatial variability

of switch grass (Panicum virgatum L.) yield as related to soil

parameters in a small field. Field Crops Res., 101: 232-239.

Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. 1934. An estimation of the degtjareff

method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed

modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci.,

: 29-38.

Webster, R. 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field.

Adv. Soil Sci., 3: 1-70.

Wright, C. H. 1939. Troells method by using Keen-Raczkowskii

Box. In: Soil Analysis. Wright, C. H. (Ed.). Thomas Marby and

Co., 1 Fleet Fane, B.C. 4, London, UK.

Xing-Yi, Z., Yue-Yu, S., Xu-Dong, Z., Kai, M. and Herbert, S.J.

Spatial variability of nutrient properties in black soil of

Northeast China. Pedosphere, 17(1): 19-29.

Zhou, H. H., Chen, Y. N. and Li, W. H. 2010. Soil properties and

their spatial pattern in an oasis on the lower reaches of the

Tarim River, northwest China. Agric. Water Mgmt.,

: 1915-1922.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Soman, S., & G., B. (2015). Geospatial Assessment and Mapping of Selected Soil Physical and Chemical Properties at Farm Level: A Case Study in an Ultisol. JOURNAL OF ROOT CROPS, 39(2), 73–86. Retrieved from https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/147

Issue

Section

Research Articles