Organic vs Conventional Management in Cassava: Growth Dynamics, Yield and Soil Properties

Authors

  • A R Seena Radhakrishnan Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram 695 017, Kerala, India
  • Suja Girija Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram 695 017, Kerala, India
  • Anish T. Anil Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram 695 017, Kerala, India

Abstract

Worldwide concerns regarding the food safety, anthropogenic degradation of the environment and the threats to human health have generated interest in sustainable alternative agricultural systems like organic farming. Cassava is a food and nutritional security crop with immense industrial uses. Lack of package of practices recommendations for organic production hinders the promotion of organic farming. Hence a field experiment was laid out during 2011 and 2012 in split plot design with three varieties, H-165, SreeVijaya and Vellayani Hraswa in main plots and five production systems, traditional, conventional, integrated and two types of organic in sub plots at Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, India, to develop technologies for organic production of cassava. Growth attributes and the phasic course of biomass production and partitioning to various plant parts were favoured under organic farming. Crop growth rate of cassava remained steady under organic management. Relative growth rate and tuber bulking rate at the mid and final phases and leaf area index and mean tuber bulking rate were seen promoted in organic practice. Organic management enhanced yield by 8% over conventional practice. At the end of second year, the pH was significantly higher and tended towards neutrality in the organic practice (5.864) and organic C status was raised by 9.5% over the conventional system. There was no significant difference in the status of available N, P and K (after second crop) or secondary and micro nutrients (after first crop). However, exchangeable Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu and Zn were slightly favoured under organic practice.The study indicates that organic management, which advocates eco-friendly technologies, was equally good as that of conventional practice. Technologies for organic production were standardized.

Author Biography

Suja Girija, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram 695 017, Kerala, India

Chief Editor, Journal of Root CropsPrincipal Scientist (Agronomy)Division of Crop ProductionCentral Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram 695 017, Kerala, India

References

Clark, M.S., Horwath, W.R, Shennan, C., Scow, K.M., 1998. Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming systems. Agron. J., 90: 662-671.

Colla, G., Mitchell, J.P., Joyce, B.A., Huyck, L.M., Wallender, W.W., Temple, S.R.., Hsiao, T.C., Poudel, D.D. 2000. Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems. Agron. J., 92: 924-932.

Gerhardt, R.A., 1997. A comparative analysis of the effects of organic and conventional farming systems on soil structure. Biol. Agric. Hort., 14: 139-157.

Gupta, R.P., Dakshinamoorthy, C. 1980. Procedures for Physical Analysis of Soil and Collection of Agrometeorological Data, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Hunt, R. 1982. Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. Arnold Publishers, London.

Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy series No.9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1159 p

Prakash, Y.S.,. Bhadoria, P.B.S., Rakshit., A., 2002. Comparative efficacy of organic manures on the changes in soil properties and nutrient availability in an alfisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 50(2), 219-221.

SAS. 2010. SAS Users Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Stockdale, E. A., Lampkin, N. H., Hovi, M., Keating, R., Lennartsson, E.K.M., Macdonald, D.W., Pade, I. S., Tattersall, F. H., Wolfe, M. S. and Watson, C. A.2001. Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Adv. Agron., 70: 261-327.

Suja, G., Sreekumar,J., Susan John, K. and Sundaresan, S.2012a. Organic production of tuberous vegetables: Agronomic, nutritional and economic benefits. J. Root Crops, 38: 135-141.

Suja, G., Sundaresan, S., Susan John, K., Sreekumar, J. and Misra, R.S. 2012b. Higher yield, profit and soil quality from organic farming of elephant foot yam. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 32: 755-764 (doi 10. 1007/s 13593-011-0058-5).

Suja, G., Susan John, K., Ravindran ,C. S., Prathapan, K. and Sundaresan, S. 2010. On farm validation of organic farming technology in elephant foot yam (Amorphophalluspaeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson). J. Root Crops, 36: 59-64.

Suja, G., Susan John, K.and Sundaresan,S. 2009. Potential of tannia (Xanthosoma sagittifolium L.) for organic production. J. Root Crops, 35: 36-40.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Seena Radhakrishnan, A. R., Girija, S., & Anil, A. T. (2015). Organic vs Conventional Management in Cassava: Growth Dynamics, Yield and Soil Properties. JOURNAL OF ROOT CROPS, 39(2), 93–99. Retrieved from https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/158

Issue

Section

Research Articles