Nutrient Efficient Genotypes and Nutrient Management Practices in the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Cassava: A Theoretical Approach

Authors

  • S.U. Shanida Beegum Central Tuber Crops Research Institute
  • K Susan John Central Tuber Crops Research Institute
  • J Sreekumar Central Tuber Crops Research Institute

Keywords:

Carbon sequestration, climate change, soil organic carbon

Abstract

Cassava, being considered as one of the food security crops for the present millennium and presumes as tolerant to weather vagaries especially drought, an attempt was initiated to assess the impact of nutrient efficient genotypes and nutrient management practices in the carbon sequestration ability of the crop to delineate it as a benign crop to combat climate change. For this, an experiment was conducted in a triplicated split plot design during 2011 under controlled condition with four genotypes (Ac. No. 766, Ac. No. 788, Ac. No. 130, H 1687) and four nutrient management practices. The nutrient management practices were POP (organic + major nutrients), soil test based fertilizer (STBF) recommendation (organic + major + secondary + micronutrients), POP (organic + major nutrients) + biofertilizers and low input management practice with green manuring in situ with cowpea as organic manure source, STBFR (major + secondary + micronutrients) and nutrient efficient biofertilizers. The parameters calculated theoretically were leaf dry matter production, carbon content in leaf dry matter, atmospheric CO2 absorbed for leaf dry matter production, reduction in atmospheric CO2 and soil organic carbon.The effect of genotypes was significant with Ac. No.130 having the maximum leaf dry matter production, leaf carbon, CO2 absorption and reduction in atmospheric CO2. However, H 1687 recorded the maximum C sequestration which was on par with Ac. No. 130 and Ac. No. 788. Though the nutrient management practices showed significant effect on all parameters, there was no significant effect on carbon sequestered, as the final soil organic carbon was not significantly different. The interaction effect was significantly highest for leaf dry matter production (0.84 t ha-1), leaf carbon content (0.38 t ha-1), CO2 absorption (13.86 ppm) and reduction (371.14 ppm) in the Ac.No.130 under STBF recommendation of organic manure and inorganic fertilizers including secondary and micronutrients.  

Author Biographies

S.U. Shanida Beegum, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute

Ph. D Research ScholarDivision of Crop ProductionCentral Tuber Crops Research Institute

K Susan John, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute

Principal ScientistDivision of Crop ProductionCentral Tuber Crops Research Institute

J Sreekumar, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute

Senior ScientistSection of Social Sciences  Central Tuber Crops Research Institute

References

Aiyer, R.S and Nair, H.K. 1985. Soils of Kerala and their management In: Soils of India and their management. The Fertilizer Association of India. New Delhi, p-475.

Batjes, N. H. 1996. Total C and N in soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47: 151.163.

CBO. 2007. Congressional budget office. The potential for carbon sequestration in the United States. Congress of US, Washington DC.

Ghosh, S., Wilson, B. R., Mandal, B., Ghoshal, S, K and Growns, I. 2010. Changes in soil organic carbon pool in three long-term fertility experiments with different cropping systems and inorganic and organic soil amendments in the eastern cereal belt of India. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 48: 413.420.

Hernanz, J. L., Lopez, R., Navarrete, L and Sanchez-Giron, V. 2002. Long-term effects of tillage systems and rotations on soil structural stability and organic carbon stratification in semiarid central Spain. Soil & Tillage Research 66: 129.141.

Hooper, D.U., Chapin, F.S., Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P and Lavorel, S. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 3.35.

IPCC. 2001. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Jian Ni. 2004. Forage yield based carbon storage in grass lands of China. Climate change 67: 237-246.

Kumar, R., Pandey, S and Pandey, A. 2006. Plant roots and carbon sequestration. Current Science. 91: 885 - 890.

Lal, R. 2004a. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1.22.

Lal, R. 2004b. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science. 304: 1623.1627.

Lal, R. 2004c. Soil carbon sequestration in India. Climate change. 65: 277-296.

Lal. 2007. Carbon management in agricultural soils. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. 12:303-322.

Lal, R. 2011. Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy. 36: 33.39.

Li, X., Feng, Y. 2002. Carbon sequestration potentials in agricultural soils. Alberta Research Council Inc, Edmonton, Alberta.

Mandal, B., Majumder, B., Bandyopadhyay, P.K., Hazra, G.C., Gangopadhyay, A., Samantaray, R.N., Mishra, A.K., Chaudhury, J., Saha, M.N., Kundu, S. 2007.The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India. Global Change Biol. 13:1-13

Ramakrishna, Y.S., Rao, G.G.S.N., Rao, G.S. and Kumar, V. 2006. Climate change. In: Environment and Agriculture (Eds. K.L. Chadha and M.S. Swaminathan), Malhothra Publishing House, New Delhi.

Rogasik, J., Schroetter, S., Funde, U., Schnug, E and Kurtinecz, P. (2004) Long-term fertilizer experiments as a data base for calculating carbon sink potential of arable soils. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 50: 11.19.

Singh, M. P., Singh, J. K., Mohanka, R and Sah, R. B. 2007. Forest environment and biodiversity. 2nd Edition. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, 212-559 pp.

Susan John, K., Ravindran, C. S., Suja, G and Prathapan, K. 2010. Soil test based fertilizer cum manurial recommendation for cassava growing soils of Kerala. J. Root Crops, 36 (1): 44-52.

Susan John, K., Ravindran, C. S., Ravi, V and James George. 2011. Cassava, a benign food security crop for carbon sequestration to mitigate global warming: Facts and figures from a long term fertilizer experiment. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Climate Change and Food Security: Challenges and Opportunities for Tuber Crops, 90-93 pp.

Walkley, A and Black, J.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtijareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid filtration method. Soil Sci., 37:93-101.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Shanida Beegum, S., Susan John, K., & Sreekumar, J. (2015). Nutrient Efficient Genotypes and Nutrient Management Practices in the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Cassava: A Theoretical Approach. JOURNAL OF ROOT CROPS, 39(2), 68–72. Retrieved from https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/67

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)